Certifications: What are they good for?5
September 11, 2013 by Kenneth Fisher
Since Microsoft decided to drop the MCM/MCA program there has been an enormous amount of discussion about the program and certifications in general. Thomas LaRock even suggested Rebooting the MCM Program Using an RV and an Endless Supply of Chicken Wings. Which I have to say sounds like a great idea to me. There has even been a fair amount of discussion about what use certificates are in general and I thought I would put in my two cents.
Personally I’ve always looked on certifications as mini degrees. From the point of view of an employer a 4 year degree doesn’t really mean all that much on your resume once you have been working in the industry for a few years. At least in the times I have been involved in hiring I have much preferred 4 years of experience over 4 years of college. It’s the same for a certificate. Certificates have a far greater worth to someone with no experience than someone with even a few years of experience. Although you will see the odd employer that requires a given degree or a given certification level most of the time they are only used to compare two people of otherwise equal skill and experience. That being said degrees and certifications do have worth. They imply two things. First that the individual had the drive and dedication to spend however much time it took to get that degree or certification. This is no small thing. It means the individual is a self starter and motivated. Both certainly good things to have in an employee. Second, they have some level of knowledge, however fleeting, however cursory, in the subject. I’ve heard it said that there are people with certificates in SQL Server that can’t perform even a simple backup. Probably true, but I’ll bet that as that person is trained, and learns to perform the backup they will have more background information (FULL vs SIMPLE recovery for example) and train faster than someone who’s never even looked at SQL Server. In neither case do degrees or certifications have anything to do with experience or even the ability to handle the job they were “trained” for. I will point out though that there are exceptions. As I understand it the lab portion of the MCM/MCA certifications was ment to show exactly that.
So how about on a personal level? Well again the degree comparison still holds. Both degrees and certifications provide a course of study. A structure forcing an individual to learn things they might not otherwise. For example I would never have gotten into computers if I hadn’t been perusing an Accounting degree that required a programming class. And along the same lines I would never have even heard of CDC and some other more obscure parts of SQL Server if they hadn’t been required for certifications I was getting ready for. And it should be mentioned that there is a certain sense of pride and accomplishment that go along with getting a degree/certification that shouldn’t be sneered at.
Finally, to those of you who say that the lower level certifications are worthless, that someone can get their MCITP/MCSE with a couple of weeks of effort with a book or two, I say “So What!” I would much rather hire the person that at least had enough interest to read the book, to make the effort, than the person who didn’t.
Category: Certification, Microsoft SQL Server, SQLServerPedia Syndication | Tags: certification, microsoft sql server
5 thoughts on “Certifications: What are they good for?”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
The very last part of your post summarized exactly what I think about that quite often derogative comments about “book certificate driven” people. It is like people saying “Hey, read books are for idiots”! Not to mention that “a book” today for those certifications quite often touch the 900 pages.
Like you said, I would rather way more a person who at least read books than a person who does not or just read tweets 😉
your last paragraph makes sense and says it all. A person will be valued more if he atleast reads the books than someone who just googles and copy paste code without even reading.
Reblogged this on Coffee and SQL and commented:
A good post!
I’m glad that they got rid of it, frankly. The only people, for the most part, who were obtaining those certifications were either 1) consultants who work for a VAR, or 2) Microsoft employees. This represents an extremely small percentage of the SQL Server community; the exams are out of reach for most. If they revamped the program (calling it something else, certainly) that meets the goals of having an exam that’s available for all interested which represents in a fair way the skills to be tested, then I’d buy in.
Additionally, the exam should have both an ‘admin’ as well as ‘developer’ tract, thus two ‘MCM/MCA’ exams. Far too much emphasis was placed on SQL engine internals, thereby leaving entire groups of knowledgeable experts, those skills and abilities as untested and unrecognized at that level.
[…] a big fan of certifications as a training exercise. However not everyone has the same interests. With the new MCSA (well new 6-8 years ago) we were […]