Counting NULLs


July 16, 2018 by Kenneth Fisher

Recently I was doing one of Kendra Little’s (b/t) SQL Server quizzes. Specifically the Quiz: COUNT() in SQL Server. As always I enjoy these quizzes and in this particular case it gave me an idea for a post.

How do NULL values affect the COUNT function?

Here are three different ways to COUNT:

Count the number of values
SELECT COUNT(FieldName) FROM TableName;
-- or

The ALL argument is the default and is unnecessary (I didn’t even know it existed until I started this post). Here you are counting the number of non NULL values in FieldName. So in a column with (1, NULL, 1, 2, 3, NULL, 1) you’ll get a count of 5. You do get a nice warning (depending on your ANSI_WARNINGS setting) if there was a NULL value though.

Warning: NULL value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.

Count the distinct number of values

Here we get the number of DISTINCT non NULL values. Using the same list of values, (1, NULL, 1, 2, 3, NULL, 1), this time you’ll get 3. Really this is the same as the regular COUNT (warnings, nulls etc) with the one exception that, currently at least, you can’t use windowing functions with COUNT DISTINCT.

Count the number of rows
-- or

Here we are counting the number of rows in the table. NULLs don’t really matter here because we aren’t counting any particular column. You can use a * or any literal. 1, ‘a’, ‘1/1/1900’ it doesn’t matter. In fact, you can even use 1/0 (from what I can tell the value used is not evaluated in a similar way to the field list in an EXISTS.)


ANSI_NULLS does not appear to have any effect on COUNT.

4 thoughts on “Counting NULLs

  1. […] Kenneth Fisher digs into the COUNT() function and sees how it deals with NULL values: […]

  2. Kris says:

    >> Warning: NULL value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation

    This warning upsets an APP that we use (presumably looks like an, unexpected, recordset or somesuch) so we avoid queries that generate this warning (may not be a bad idea anyway in case ignoring it, tomorrow, that warning then hides something else …)

    So my preference is

    SUM(CASE WHEN FieldName IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS [NotNullCount]
    SUM(CASE WHEN FieldName IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS [NullCount]


    SELECT COUNT(1/NULL) FROM TableName; –Returns 0 (zero).
    SELECT COUNT(NULL) TableName; –Returns 0 (zero).

    Presumably because it returns a set of NULLs and then does the count of the set of nulls it created..

    Just a curious result and another reason to dislike NULLs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,442 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

ToadWorld Pro of the Month November 2013
%d bloggers like this: